Compute & AI Infrastructure

Match high-performance compute to the work it must do.

Translate model, data, network, operational, and commercial requirements into an infrastructure plan that can be compared, activated, measured, and renewed with intent.

High-performance compute system with interconnected accelerators, networking, and storage

Capacity as a system

Resolve the technical and commercial model together.

Accelerator choice matters, but productive capacity also depends on workload behavior, data movement, orchestration, operations, and the terms under which the infrastructure is used.

Profile Demand

Characterize training, tuning, inference, and simulation workloads by memory, throughput, latency, precision, run duration, concurrency, data locality, and growth.

Outcome: a workload and demand profile that can support comparison.

Evaluate Options

Compare systems, providers, deployment models, network and storage requirements, support boundaries, and commercial structures against the same demand profile.

Outcome: a traceable technical and commercial option comparison.

Activate Capacity

Prepare networking, storage, scheduling, access, security, deployment, and observability so capacity arrives as an operable platform rather than isolated hardware.

Outcome: an activation plan with dependencies and operating ownership.

Improve Economics

Measure utilization, queue behavior, allocation, and cost drivers. Use that evidence for showback or chargeback, capacity adjustments, commercial review, and renewal planning.

Outcome: an evidence base for ongoing capacity and commercial decisions.

Comparable options

Keep the workload profile constant.

A useful provider or deployment comparison applies the same workload assumptions to capacity shape, networking, storage, scheduling, support, term, commitment, and exit conditions. This separates real trade-offs from differences in packaging.

Technical references

A compact basis for early comparison.

Reference specifications can help frame memory, bandwidth, system density, and facility implications before provider and deployment constraints are applied.

Verified accelerator and rack-system reference specifications
PlatformMemoryBandwidthReference
H200141 GB HBM3e4.8 TB/sApproximately 1.4× H100 training and up to 1.8× inference
B200192 GB HBM3eApproximately 8 TB/sBlackwell
B300288 GB HBM3e8 TB/sBlackwell Ultra
GB300 NVL72Rack-scale HBM3e: about 20 TBNVLink fabric: 130 TB/s72 GPUs, 36 Grace CPUs, approximately 120 kW, 1.1 exaFLOPS FP4

Specifications are references and not evidence of inventory, price, region, availability, or delivery timing.

Start here

Make the next capacity decision comparable.

Bring the workload profile, provider options, or renewal question. We’ll help turn it into an actionable infrastructure plan.

Start a conversation